Next next blog post, members accomplished another temporary survey which included the same facts as the earliest on the evaluation of one’s perpetrator. A final part alarmed participants’ amount of political desire, political worry about-positioning to the 10-area left–right continuum, intercourse, age, section of house and you may knowledge.
Players have been randomly assigned to certainly half a dozen experimental criteria derived in the 2 (perpetrator’s intercourse) ? 3 (repair strategy) between people factorial build.
All actions performed inside studies was in fact in accordance with the moral requirements of one’s federal research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki endments.
Analysis of governmental actor
People advertised their global feelings to the fictitious politician on a beneficial 10-section scale (step 1 = totally negative to help you ten = completely self-confident) double, immediately following in the T1 (post-scandal) and when at T2 (post–protective effect). The efficacy of the brand new defensive tactic for the restoring profile try grabbed from the improvement in evaluation of the protagonist.
Analysis of the politician’s communality and you will agencies both before and after his or their justification of the scandal
The brand new respondents examined the newest scandal culprit into a beneficial 5-point scale between 1 (definitely not) so you’re able to 5 (definitely) double, just after after the scandal (T1) and once pursuing the perpetrator’s defensive response (T2). Users ranked the latest culprit into the around three adjectives for every toward communality aspect (sincere, sensible and you can empathetic) and you may company dimension (determined, competent and you can strong; elizabeth.g., Bauer 2017 ). The latest indicator constructed on the imply situations reached sufficient reliability: ? communality post-scandal = 0.80; ? communality article-reason = 0.74; ? agency post-scandal = 0.63; ? company article-reason = 0.67.
Overall performance
Initial regression analyses including the politician’s attractiveness, respondents’ intercourse, respondents’ governmental direction, respondents’ quantities of demand for government and respondents’ expectations concerning comparative honesty of females and you can males didn’t produce people head neither communication effect on the latest built details. Therefore, they will not be considered from inside the next analyses.
We tested H1 using a 3 (type of defensive tactic) ? 2 (perpetrator’s gender) ANOVA on the global attitude toward the politician after his/her defensive reaction including the previous attitude (T1) as a covariate. The hypothesised two-way interaction between the independent variables proved to be the only significant effect, F (2, 185) = 6.06; p = 0.003; ? 2 p = 0.06 (Figure 1 ). Further inspection of this interaction revealed that the ‘diffusion of responsibility with accusation of another person’ was effective only when used by the man, simple slope = 0.11, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [0.03, 0.19], whereas the ‘excuses with claims of mitigating circumstances’ was effective only when used by the woman, simple slope = 0.09, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [0.00, 0.17]. Finally, contrary to our expectations, ‘mortification with request for forgiveness’ did not vary its efficacy as a function of the politician’s gender, simple slope = 0.00, SE = 0.04, 95% CI [–0.08, 0.08].
Mean all over the world ideas with the an excellent scandal culprit just like the a function of his/the lady gender as well as the verbal strategy accustomed defend him/by herself.
Regarding H2, the ANOVA including the agentic and communal dimensions measured at T2 as a repeated factor (and those measured at T1 as covariates) revealed the main effect of the repeated factor, F (1, 184) = 9.13, p = 0.003, ? 2 p = 0.05, signalling that the defensive reactions were globally more effective in improving the perpetrator agentic traits (M = 0.30, SD = 0.17) than the communal ones (M = 0.27, SD = 0.18). This analysis also elicited the two-way interaction between the type of defensive tactic and the repeated factor, F (1, 184) = 9.13, p 2 p = 0.14, indicating that the ‘diffusion of responsibility’ improved the evaluation of the perpetrator on agentic traits more than the other defensive tactics, that did not differ from each other at the LSD post-hoc test, whereas none of the tactics differed from each other as for the efficacy in improving the perceived perpetrator communality. In addition, the two-way interaction between the gender of the politician and the repeated factor, F (1, 184) = , p 2 p = 0.15 showed that the defensive reactions, irrespective of the type, improved the communality traits of the female politician (M = 0.31, SD = 0.19) more than those of the male one (M = 0.23; SD = 0.17), simple slope = 0.06, SE = 0.02, 95% CI [0.02, 0.10], whereas they were equally effective in improving the agentic traits of the male politician (M = 0.32, SD = 0.18) and those of the female one (M = 0.28, SD = 0.16), simple slope = 0.04; SE = 0.02, 95% CI [–0 https://datingmentor.org/pl/parship-recenzja/.01, 0.08].
Nenhum produto no carrinho.